Mon. May 25th, 2026
Spread the love

Trump and Elon Musk: From Feud to Fragile Friendship

By Abi John Balogun | October 2025

As Donald Trump trends once again on X (formerly Twitter), speculation is mounting that the on-and-off feud between the former U.S. President and billionaire tech mogul Elon Musk may finally be cooling down. After months of online jabs, public insults, and political drama, recent gestures from both sides suggest a cautious reconciliation — or at least a temporary truce between two of the most influential men on the planet.


A Timeline of a Complicated Relationship

The Trump–Musk relationship has never been simple. Their connection has swung from alliance to animosity and back, depending largely on politics, business interests, and egos. What started as mutual admiration during Trump’s presidency in the late 2010s has since evolved into a power struggle shaped by social media and shifting loyalties.

Early Cooperation and Mutual Admiration

In the early 2020s, Musk appeared to be one of Trump’s unlikely allies. Despite their differences, Musk — then the world’s richest man and owner of X, Tesla, and SpaceX — shared Trump’s skepticism about government bureaucracy and over-regulation.

Musk was among the private-sector figures consulted during Trump’s first term about innovation and infrastructure. At one point, Trump praised Musk as a “genius inventor” who was “making America great again through technology.”

The goodwill continued even after Musk initially distanced himself from Washington politics. When Trump returned to political prominence ahead of the 2024 election, Musk quietly supported some of his policies, particularly those promoting deregulation and tax incentives for businesses.


The Breakup: From Allies to Adversaries

Things changed dramatically in mid-2025, when Musk publicly criticized Trump’s sweeping “One Big Beautiful Bill” — a controversial economic package that combined spending cuts with new tariffs and subsidies.

Musk argued that the bill was “anti-innovation” and would hurt America’s future competitiveness. He accused Trump of being “stuck in 1985 economics” and even resurfaced old Trump tweets about deficits to make his point.

Trump, known for his combative style, hit back immediately. In a fiery press conference, he said, “Elon and I had a great relationship. I don’t know if we will anymore.” He accused Musk of hypocrisy for benefiting from government contracts while “lecturing about free markets.”

The spat escalated further on X — Musk’s own platform — where he and Trump traded barbs for weeks. At one point, Musk hinted at supporting efforts to impeach Trump, while Trump called Musk a “Twitter tyrant” who “owes his fortune to government handouts.”

By late summer, the feud had become a staple of political talk shows. Analysts described it as “a clash of titans” — not just personal, but symbolic of a deeper tension between Silicon Valley’s libertarian elite and Trump’s populist nationalism.


The Apology and a Tentative Thaw

In June 2025, Musk surprised followers by posting an unexpected message on X:

“I regret some of my posts about President @realDonaldTrump last week — they went too far.”

The post marked a turning point. According to ABC News, Musk privately called Trump to convey his regrets, acknowledging that his online tone had been “too harsh.” Sources close to Trump confirmed the call and described it as “cordial but cautious.”

Trump’s team responded with uncharacteristic restraint, saying they “appreciated Musk’s acknowledgment” and were “focused on the business of the American people.”

The following months saw subtle signs of rapprochement. In September, both men attended the memorial service for conservative commentator Charlie Kirk in Arizona. Photographs of Trump and Musk shaking hands quickly went viral, fueling speculation that the feud had officially ended.

Still, Trump later told reporters, “I don’t hold grudges, but I also don’t forget. We’ll see where it goes.”

In other words, the peace remains fragile.


What’s Driving the Reconciliation?

Several factors seem to have pushed the two men back toward détente.

1. Mutual Interest

Despite their differences, both Trump and Musk benefit from maintaining at least a working relationship.

For Trump, Musk’s influence over the tech industry — and especially his control of X — gives him access to the most important communications platform in modern politics. For Musk, smoothing things over with Trump may help preserve federal contracts and favorable policy conditions for his companies, particularly SpaceX and Tesla.

2. Shared Ideology (with Caveats)

Both men advocate for minimal government interference, free enterprise, and skepticism of traditional media. They have rallied similar audiences: Trump’s political base and Musk’s fanbase on X overlap heavily in the tech-savvy libertarian demographic.

Yet, they differ on key issues like renewable energy, trade policy, and government subsidies — areas where Musk’s business interests often clash with Trump’s protectionist policies.

3. Public Image and Ego Management

Both are masters of public spectacle. The feud may have simply run its course once it ceased to benefit either man. After months of negative headlines, each likely realized that continued hostility was more damaging than productive.


A Relationship Built on Convenience

Political observers are cautious about calling this a full reconciliation. As The Financial Times put it, the current state of affairs is “a truce born of mutual benefit, not mutual trust.”

Even after Musk’s apology, Trump reportedly told aides that Musk “shouldn’t expect forgiveness overnight.” According to Business Insider, Trump “has no desire to fix his relationship with Musk,” even after Musk deleted critical posts.

Meanwhile, Musk has avoided endorsing Trump’s policies directly but has refrained from the kind of biting commentary that characterized their feud earlier in the year.

The result is a pragmatic coexistence: each man recognizing the power of the other, while keeping a wary distance.


Historical Context: The Trump–Musk Pattern

Their relationship has followed a familiar cycle of cooperation and conflict for nearly a decade:

Year Event Status
2017 Musk serves on Trump’s advisory councils Friendly
2018 Musk resigns after U.S. withdrawal from Paris Climate Agreement Strained
2020–2021 Musk praises Trump-era deregulation Warm
2024 Musk donates indirectly to pro-Trump PACs Allied
Mid-2025 Public feud erupts over legislation and contracts Hostile
Late 2025 Musk apologizes and handshake at memorial service Thawing

The pattern suggests their relationship is less ideological and more situational — dictated by what each stands to gain at any given time.


What Comes Next

Whether this latest peace lasts depends on future political developments. If Trump continues to dominate the political landscape, Musk may see alignment as good business. But if Trump returns to hardline populism that clashes with Musk’s globalist ventures, tensions could reignite overnight.

Political analyst Dana Bash summarized it best:

“They don’t need to like each other. They just need each other.”

In the end, both men understand the value of influence — Trump in politics, Musk in technology. And for now, at least, that shared awareness is enough to keep their uneasy friendship alive.


Sources: Financial Times, ABC News, Fortune, Business Insider, Time Magazine, Wired, The Wall Street Journal

By admin

You missed

From Tramadol to Canadian to Exol-5 The New Drug Destroying Nigerian Youths An Investigative Article .From Tramadol to Canadian to Exol-5: The New Drug Destroying Nigerian Youths An Investigative Report on the Shifting Landscape of Substance Abuse in Nigeria Nigeria faces a severe and evolving drug crisis, particularly among its youth. What began with the widespread abuse of Tramadol has progressed through mixtures like “Canadian” to newer pharmaceutical diversions such as Exol-5. This shift reflects deeper issues: easy access to prescription drugs, weak regulation, socioeconomic pressures, and aggressive street-level marketing. NDLEA operations and health studies reveal a public health emergency that threatens an entire generation. Phase 1: The Tramadol Epidemic (2010s–Early 2020s) Tramadol, a synthetic opioid prescribed for moderate to severe pain, became Nigeria’s most notorious street drug. Cheap, potent, and widely smuggled (often from India and other Asian countries), it offered users energy, euphoria, and pain relief — appealing to commercial drivers, laborers, students, and young men seeking confidence or stamina. Scale of the Problem: Millions of tablets seized annually by NDLEA. High prevalence among young males aged 15–35. Linked to increased crime, sexual violence, organ damage (kidney failure, seizures), and mental health breakdowns. Contributed to broader opioid misuse alongside codeine cough syrups. Government responses included tighter import controls and public awareness campaigns, but these only displaced demand to other substances rather than eliminating it. Phase 2: The Rise of “Canadian” (Mid-2020s) “Canadian” or “Canadian Loud” emerged as a popular code for high-grade cannabis (often indica-dominant strains) or cannabis mixed with other synthetics. It gained traction as users sought alternatives or combinations to Tramadol’s effects. This phase marked a move toward imported or locally cultivated premium weed, sometimes laced with stronger chemicals. Youths in urban centers like Lagos, Kano, Jos, and Onitsha embraced it for its perceived “cleaner” high compared to opioids. However, it fueled polydrug use — combining cannabis with opioids, sedatives, or alcohol — amplifying health risks. Phase 3: Exol-5 – The Current Threat (2024–2026) Exol-5 (Benzhexol Hydrochloride / Trihexyphenidyl 5mg), originally a prescription medication for Parkinson’s disease and drug-induced movement disorders, has become the latest pharmaceutical being heavily abused. Why Exol-5? Euphoric Effects: Users report intense euphoria, hallucinations, and a sense of detachment — making it attractive as a cheap “upper” or escape. Accessibility: Sold over-the-counter or on the black market despite being a controlled prescription drug. NDLEA has seized millions of pills in single operations (e.g., 3.1 million pills in Kano in late 2024, and over 5.6 million combined with Tramadol in other busts). Street Names: Exol, Artane, Benzhexol, “Farin Mallam” (in Northern Nigeria). Demographics: Prevalent among youths, laborers, and even psychiatric patients who divert prescriptions. Studies show abuse rates as high as 25% among certain outpatient groups. Health Consequences: Anticholinergic toxicity: Confusion, dry mouth, blurred vision, urinary retention, constipation, and in high doses — delirium, psychosis, seizures, and heart issues. Long-term: Cognitive impairment, addiction, exacerbated mental health disorders. Often mixed with Tramadol, codeine, or cannabis, creating dangerous synergies. In cities like Jos, Exol-5 sits alongside diazepam, Rohypnol, and Tramadol on street markets, easily available to teenagers and young adults. Why This Evolution Continues Supply-Side Failures: Porous borders, corrupt officials, and overproduction of pharmaceuticals enable diversion. Demand Drivers: Unemployment, poverty, peer pressure, trauma, and the pursuit of performance enhancement (e.g., for “hustle” culture). Weak Regulation: Many pharmacies sell restricted drugs without prescriptions. Online and street vendors fill gaps. Displacement Effect: Cracking down on one substance (Tramadol/codeine) pushes users and dealers toward the next available option. NDLEA reports ongoing large seizures, but the problem persists due to high profitability and low risk for mid-level distributors. Broader Impacts on Nigerian Youths Education: Increased dropout rates and poor academic performance. Mental Health: Rising cases of psychosis and depression. Economy: Lost productivity among the working-age population. Crime and Violence: Drug-fueled robberies, cultism, and family breakdowns. Public Health System Strain: Overburdened hospitals treating overdoses and chronic complications. Young people aged 15–39 remain the hardest hit, with national surveys showing drug use prevalence significantly above global averages. What Must Be Done Stronger Enforcement: Consistent prosecution of corrupt enablers and large-scale traffickers. Regulation: Crackdown on rogue pharmacies and better tracking of prescription drugs. Prevention & Rehabilitation: School programs, community outreach, and expanded treatment centers (currently woefully inadequate). Economic Alternatives: Address root causes like youth unemployment. Public Awareness: Honest campaigns highlighting real dangers of “Exol-5” and similar drugs. Conclusion From Tramadol’s opioid grip to “Canadian” cannabis culture and now Exol-5’s anticholinergic highs, Nigeria’s drug crisis is mutating faster than responses can contain it. Exol-5 represents the dangerous new frontier — a legitimate medicine turned youth destroyer due to misuse and greed. Without urgent, multi-layered intervention — combining supply disruption, demand reduction, and socioeconomic support — an entire generation risks being lost to addiction. The time for half-measures is over. Nigeria’s future depends on winning this fight.