Does BLORD Have the Right To Trademark the Word Ratel an Animal That means He can Trademark Lion Tiger !
Who Has the Right to Use “Ratel” Under International/Nigerian Trademark Law?
📌 What’s Happening
-
Blord, a Nigerian entrepreneur, has publicly announced that he has trademarked “Ratel” as a business brand name and has issued a cease-and-desist letter to activist VeryDarkMan (VDM), telling him to stop calling his followers “Ratels” unless he gets permission.
-
VDM, for his part, insists true ownership of the name comes from authenticity and the identity of his community — not legal paperwork.
📌 Trademark Law Reality
Under trademark law (including Nigerian law and common international principles):
✔ Trademark registration gives rights in specific classes of goods or services — it doesn’t automatically block all other use of a word in every context.
✔ There are many classes (e.g., clothing, software, entertainment, activism), and the same word can be registered in different classes by different people unless they overlap/confuse consumers.
✔ A registered trademark only prevents others from using the same (or confusingly similar) mark in the same class of goods/services or where there’s a likelihood of consumer confusion.
So in international law and according to Nigerian trademark practice:
-
If Blord’s trademark is valid and he registered “Ratel” in a specific class (e.g., fintech app), he can stop others from using that name in that class.
-
But if VDM uses “Ratel” as an activist movement or fan-base identity — not commercial software in the same class — he may still legally use the term.
👉 Because “ratel” is also the name of an animal (the honey badger), generic use by others in unrelated contexts is generally not excluded by trademark law unless it’s used in the same category with likelihood of confusion — e.g., if Blord were selling honey badgers or wildlife tours. That’s why trademarks often focus on classes, not absolute ownership of everyday words.
🐾 Lagos Story: Blord, VDM, Ratel, and the Dotifi.com Mediator
In the bustling city of Lagos — where okadas zoom faster than Twitter trends — two larger-than-life personalities were at each other’s throats over a most curious thing: the word “Ratel.”
Blord, the flashy crypto tycoon with more chains than a rail crossing on Third Mainland Bridge, had just announced (to great fanfare) that he had trademarked “Ratel” for his shiny new app.
Meanwhile, VeryDarkMan (VDM) — Lagos’s resident social critic whose followers called themselves Ratels (after the fearless honey badger animal) — woke up one morning to find the word he’d been shouting on every livestream suddenly claimed by Blord.
Now enter Dotifi.com — not an okada rider, not a blogger, but the voice of calm in the storm. Dotifi.com stepped up like a seasoned Lagos mediator and said:
“Okay, gentlemen — before we start calling lawyers and sending cease-and-desist letters by PA system, let me ask a few things…”
So Dotifi.com asked:
🤔 “Blord, my brother, did you trademark just the word for your app, or do you mean you own it for everything on earth? Because if so, then soon you will trademark lion and hippopotamus and we’ll all be using your app’s names for wildlife safaris.”
Blord adjusted his Gucci sunglasses and said, “Well… I trademarked it. End of story.”
Then Dotifi.com turned to VDM:
🤨 “VDM, if the word means something to your followers because of what you built, does a piece of paper suddenly take that meaning away?”
VDM, passionately holding a toy ratel, replied: “No, brother. There can only be one true ratel — and it lives in the hearts of my followers. Trademark or no trademark.”
Dotifi.com then said:
📢 “Ladies and gentlemen, Lagos traffic, and all Ratels listening… under trademark law, Blord can protect *his use of the name in the specific business class he registered it for. But VDM can still call his crowd Ratels — as long as he isn’t selling the same kind of thing and confusing people. Now, let’s go get suya.”
And everyone laughed… until the lawyers arrived.
🧠 Bottom Line: Who Can Use “Ratel”?
🔹 Blord likely has rights to use “Ratel” for his registered brand/app category.
🔹 VDM can likely still use it to refer to his activist fanbase/community — because trademarks don’t give exclusive global ownership of ordinary words across all contexts.
🔹 If both end up in the same trademark class selling similar services, conflict may arise — but that still depends on legal nuance, consumer confusion, and evidence.